Construction Transactions & Cases

Representative examples of McLennan Ross construction litigation matters include:

Oil Sands

• Represented a mining contractor in a contract dispute with the owner and operator of a mining project in the Athabasca oil sands. The result was a judgment in excess of $23 million in favour of the mining contractor.
• Represented the owner of an oil sands plant in one of the largest lawsuits in Alberta and Canadian history. The claim arose from a fire at the plant, which resulted in consequential damage to the site, delay claims and economic loss.
• Provide ongoing advice to the owner on contract interpretation, negotiating terms of hold backs, enforcing lien rights and resolving payment issues, regarding the construction of a major industrial facility in northern Alberta.
• Acted for a joint venture owner in the negotiation and preparation of oil sands project agreements including: ownership and management venture agreement, Alberta crown royalty agreement, Alberta oil sands pipeline agreement, AEC utility plant agreements, gas pipeline agreements and other project related agreements. 
• Acted on behalf of an oil sands co-generation facility with respect to an insurance claim for engineering errors and omissions; a contractor supplying materials to the oil sands facility with respect to a claim by the owner; and contractors with respect to claims for delay and breach of contract against the owners; and others.
  

• Acted for a contractor in a significant claim with respect to a sewer project. After consulting with experts and discussions between clients, the lawsuit was resolved by cost sharing among all parties to the construction.
• Represented a general contractor in a claim against the federal government over incorrect geotechnical information on contract documents. The lawsuit was settled after examination for discovery.
  

• Acted for an industrial operator in a claim for repair costs against a group of design professionals who provided services in the design and construction of a large cooling pond. The claim for repair costs was settled.
• Represented a geotechnical engineering firm in a claim brought by the owners of a luxury condominium project. The owners alleged improper investigation of site soils and design advice respecting the installation of below grade piping.
  

• Settled a major lawsuit between an engineering procurement and construction contractor and a mechanical/electrical subcontractor. The lawsuit arose from damages incurred during the construction of a nitric acid plant in southern Alberta.
• Acted for a number of horizontal directional drilling companies in claims arising from failed or delayed drilling projects. The projects in question range from relatively small water line road crossings to oil and gas pipeline crossings over major bodies of water. 
• Acted for an international supplier of concrete and cement who provided no-slump concrete to a piling contractor. It was alleged that the pilings that were poured did not meet strength tests. 
• Acted on behalf of a mechanical contractor who was sued by a general contractor for negligent performance as a result of overruns and delays in the construction of a chemical facility. A settlement was negotiated and resulted in dismissal of the claim.
  

• Acted on behalf of an insurance company in a multi-party litigation action against a contractor who had installed the exterior curtain of a 27-storey, exclusive, residential apartment building. The action was resolved through alternate dispute resolution.
• Acted for the developer of a high-rise luxury condominium project in a dispute with its mechanical contractor over adherence to schedule, coordination of work and claims to extras.
  

• Acted for a construction equipment company in a contract dispute with a coal mine operator. The mining company entered into a contract to lease construction equipment from our client and subsequently cancelled the contract. The construction equipment company sued and recovered full amount of the minimum lease payments plus interest and costs.
• Acted as Canadian counsel for a large supplier of construction materials that was involved in class action products liability litigation in the State of California.
  

• Acted for a joint venture owner with respect to the negotiation and preparation of purchase and sale agreements with respect to its interest in a major oilsands project.
• Acted on behalf of a contractor in the negotiation and preparation of construction agreements with respect to an oil sands facility. 
• Provide ongoing advice and assistance to a constructor of grain handling, feed processing and intensive livestock systems - including advice in respect of the contractual delineation and discharge of Prime Contractor duties and responsibilities.
  

• Acted for a general contractor in a claim against an owner and the owner’s consultant for extras, delay and acceleration in the construction of water diversion and storage facilities. The arbitration resulted in an award in favour of our client with respect to the numerous extras claimed on the project.
• Acted for parties involved in a multi-party, multi-faceted dispute with respect to the upstream and downstream components of a large oilsands project. The numerous lawsuits were resolved through mediation to the satisfaction of our clients. 
• Appointed as the Province of Alberta's nominee as arbitrator in an arbitration with respect to oil sands royalty issue. 
• Acted for the owner of an oil sands co-generation facility in arbitration proceedings with respect to a claim by a contractor for extras.
  

• Acted for a major road-builder in a case that established the contractor's right to lien all of the parcels of land making up a major mineral extraction project in relation to the contractor's work on only one parcel.
• Represented a number of lien claimants on three related commercial projects. This case established a precedent for obtaining payment for the lien claimants even though the dispute over the value of the work prevented the lien fund from being established.
  

• Acted on behalf of an owner in a claim against an insurer for engineering errors and omissions in relation to the design and construction of a co-generation facility.
• Acted on behalf of a supplier and their insurer, to seek a declaration as to the existence and scope of a project owner's course of construction policy of insurance. The action arose in response to a claim against several contractors and suppliers stemming from a multi-million dollar construction loss. The project owner's insurer had denied that the loss was an insured loss.
  

Printer friendly version