EXPERTISE DIRECTORY NEWS PUBLICATIONS EVENTS CAREERS COMMUNITY SUPPORT FIRM CONTACT US



McLennan Ross Lawyers inside page header image law firm
Quick Links



Publications

Articles & Media

Email Alerts

HSE Law Newsletter

Legal Counsel Newsletter

News

Video Presentations

Alberta Construction Law Blog

Archives


Sign up to receive any of our publications via email 
McLennan Ross Lawyers Blue Side Bar Bottom

McLennan Ross Home  > Publications

More Support for Random Testing

22-Jul-11
 

By Hugh McPhail, Q.C.

This week, in the latest case on drug/alcohol testing, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal issued a decision upholding random alcohol testing at an Irving pulp and paper mill. Any time a Court of Appeal decides an issue it is accorded considerable weight across the country.

The Court concluded that the employer’s and employees’ rights are reasonably balanced when random alcohol testing is introduced to a workplace that is inherently dangerous. Testing is done by breath analyzer and it only applies to employees holding safety-sensitive positions. The decision is of more weight because it involved the quashing of an arbitration decision, and not just the upholding of a decision because it was not proven to be unreasonable. The arbitrator had said that proof of an alcohol problem in the workplace was required because the site was not ultra-safety-sensitive. That division between degrees of safety-sensitivity was rejected by the Court of Appeal.

The case does not deal with drug testing. Random drug-testing continues to be a more controversial topic because a drug test will only rarely indicate impairment.


 

  
 

 

Print this page
Email this page





  Site Map |   Privacy Policy |   Contact Us



Real Time Web Analytics